\u00cbsht\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrjetim i rrall\u00eb dhe i ve\u00e7ant\u00eb kur rastis t\u00eb lexosh nj\u00eb roman mbres\u00ebl\u00ebn\u00ebs, dhe pastaj t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin e sheh si film. P\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin rr\u00ebfim p\u00ebrjetimi vjen i dyfisht\u00eb, i p\u00ebr\u00e7uar tek audienca n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet dy mediumeve t\u00eb ndryshme. Filmi e p\u00ebrmbush romanin dhe anasjelltas, gj\u00eb q\u00eb i ndihmon audienc\u00ebs t\u00eb krijoj\u00eb nj\u00eb tablo sa m\u00eb t\u00eb plot\u00eb mbi narracionin. Pra, aty ku romani nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb kuptuar plot\u00ebsisht, apo aty ku lexuesi nuk ka qart\u00ebsi mbi narracionin, filmi i ndihmon t\u00eb mbush\u00eb boshll\u00ebqet. Dhe, n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi, filmi \u00ebsht\u00eb zhan\u00ebr m\u00eb leht\u00eb i kap\u00ebrdish\u00ebm, se \u00ebsht\u00eb ndoshta edhe m\u00eb zbavit\u00ebs. Filmin e shikon p\u00ebr nj\u00eb or\u00eb e gjysm\u00eb, romanin e lexon p\u00ebr tet\u00eb or\u00eb, ndoshta. Kjo e b\u00ebn edhe transmetimin e mesazhit nga filmi tek audienca m\u00eb efektiv dhe mbase m\u00eb t\u00eb preksh\u00ebm. Nd\u00ebrsa leximi i romanit \u00ebsht\u00eb gjithsesi k\u00ebnaq\u00ebsi shpirt\u00ebrore, \u00ebsht\u00eb m\u00ebsim, por si akt mbase k\u00ebrkon m\u00eb shum\u00eb pun\u00eb se filmi. K\u00ebshtu, filmi mund t\u00eb ndihmoj\u00eb n\u00eb t\u00eb kuptuarit sa m\u00eb t\u00eb plot\u00eb t\u00eb ngjarjes s\u00eb romanit, dhe anasjelltas. Pra, e plot\u00ebsojn\u00eb nj\u00ebri tjetrin.<\/p>\n
N\u00eb an\u00ebn tjet\u00ebr, p\u00ebrjetimi i t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebs storie n\u00eb form\u00ebn e romanit dhe pastaj t\u00eb filmit (apo e kund\u00ebrta) ka rrezik t\u00eb sjell\u00eb konflikte t\u00eb nd\u00ebrlikuara tek audienca. N\u00eb vend se ta p\u00ebrmbushin nj\u00ebra tjetr\u00ebn, k\u00ebto dy zhanre mund t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyjn\u00eb si shemra n\u00eb imagjinat\u00ebn e lexues-shikuesit, dhe t\u00eb mbjellin kund\u00ebrshti tek ai. Ne, kur lexojm\u00eb roman, p\u00ebrfshihemi n\u00eb nj\u00eb akt t\u00eb nj\u00ebansh\u00ebm, pra lexojm\u00eb at\u00eb q\u00eb na kumtohet nga shkrimtari. Shkrimtari shkruan, kurse ne jemi receptor\u00ebt: pranojm\u00eb at\u00eb shkrim n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet leximit. Megjithat\u00eb, leximi \u00ebsht\u00eb edhe akt i dyansh\u00ebm, \u00ebsht\u00eb bashk\u00ebbisedim. Ne si lexues nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb q\u00eb ve\u00e7 lexojm\u00eb. Ne bashk\u00ebbisedojm\u00eb me vepr\u00ebn q\u00eb lexojm\u00eb. Duke p\u00ebrdorur imagjinat\u00ebn ton\u00eb ne i mveshim ngjarjet, vendndodhit\u00eb, personazhet me tipare t\u00eb ngjizura nga imagjinata jon\u00eb dhe nga p\u00ebrjetimi yn\u00eb subjektiv. P.sh. nj\u00eb storie q\u00eb p\u00ebrshkruan nj\u00eb dit\u00eb t\u00eb zymt\u00eb me shi, n\u00eb nj\u00eb fshat piktoresk anglez n\u00eb vitet \u201950, ku nj\u00eb burr\u00eb dhe nj\u00eb grua takohen dhe pijn\u00eb \u00e7aj s\u00eb bashku n\u00eb hotelin te sheshi, form\u00ebsohet subjektivisht n\u00eb imagjinat\u00ebn e lexuesit. Duke qen\u00eb subjektiv, p\u00ebrjetimi im dallon nga p\u00ebrjetimi yt, anipse ne t\u00eb dy kemi lexuar t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin roman. Madje mund t\u00eb them se \u00e7do p\u00ebrjetim mbi t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin roman nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb identik me tjetrin, edhe n\u00ebse t\u00eb nj\u00ebjt\u00ebn vep\u00ebr e kan\u00eb lexuar me miliona njer\u00ebz. P\u00ebr \u00e7do lexues, pra, leximi \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrjetim personal, intim. \u00c7do lexues p\u00ebrjeton katarz\u00ebn e vet.<\/p>\n
Rrjedhimisht, nuk \u00ebsht\u00eb \u00e7udi q\u00eb pasi t\u00eb kemi krijuar nj\u00eb p\u00ebrjetim tejet personal mbi romanin e lexuar, filmi i bazuar mbi at\u00eb roman t\u00eb na krijoj\u00eb huti dhe kund\u00ebrth\u00ebnie. Kjo sepse filmi do t\u00eb ket\u00eb nj\u00eb interpretim t\u00eb vetin mbi at\u00eb roman, e q\u00eb nuk do t\u00eb p\u00ebrkoj\u00eb me at\u00eb t\u00eb krijuar n\u00eb imagjinat\u00ebn ton\u00eb. Dhe k\u00ebtu lind konflikti personal.<\/strong>\u00a0Pashmangshm\u00ebrisht, filmi do t\u00eb nd\u00ebrhyj\u00eb vrazhd\u00eb brenda p\u00ebrjetimit t\u00eb krijuar n\u00eb imagjinat\u00ebn intime, dhe do t\u00eb modifikoj\u00eb at\u00eb p\u00ebrjetim. Personazhet t\u00eb cil\u00ebve ne u kemi dh\u00ebn\u00eb fytyra t\u00eb caktuara, nuk do t\u00eb duken m\u00eb ashtu. Fytyrat e tyre tani do t\u00eb interferohen nga ato t\u00eb aktor\u00ebve q\u00eb i luajn\u00eb ato role n\u00eb film. E k\u00ebshtu me radh\u00eb, derisa katarza jon\u00eb individuale t\u00eb p\u00ebsoj\u00eb ndryshim, duke u b\u00ebr\u00eb produkt i bashk\u00ebdyzimit roman dhe film, q\u00eb sigurisht do t\u00eb jet\u00eb ndryshe nga p\u00ebrjetimi yn\u00eb fillestar. Pra, me film ne humbim di\u00e7ka nga p\u00ebrjetimi fillestar nga romani, p\u00ebr ta modifikuar at\u00eb me p\u00ebrshtypjet nga filmi.<\/p>\n Dit\u00ebt q\u00eb na kan\u00eb mbetur – romani<\/u><\/em><\/p>\n Libri i shkrimtarit britanik me prejardhje japoneze Kazuo Ishiguro \u201dThe remains of the day\u201d (ndoshta m\u00eb s\u00eb miri i p\u00ebrkthyer si \u201cDit\u00ebt q\u00eb na kan\u00eb mbetur\u201d) \u00ebsht\u00eb nj\u00eb rr\u00ebfim prek\u00ebs dhe heshturazi dramatik, i shkruar me nj\u00eb gjuh\u00eb fine dhe elegante. Libri, me t\u00eb cilin nobelisti Ishiguro fitoi edhe shp\u00ebrblimin Booker Prize n\u00eb Britani, tregohet nga k\u00ebndv\u00ebshtrimi i nj\u00eb Butleri anglez, apo kryesh\u00ebrb\u00ebtor, specie e ve\u00e7ant\u00eb n\u00eb kultur\u00ebn angleze q\u00eb buron prej dit\u00ebve t\u00eb hershme t\u00eb perandoris\u00eb s\u00eb saj, e q\u00eb zakonisht punonte p\u00ebr familje t\u00eb pasura aristokrate. Butleri n\u00eb fjal\u00eb – Z. Stevens – kishte sh\u00ebrbyer n\u00eb k\u00ebshtjell\u00ebn e Lordit Darlington p\u00ebrgjat\u00eb viteve \u201930 e deri n\u00eb fillim t\u00eb viteve \u201950 t\u00eb shekullit XX. Ky lib\u00ebr na p\u00ebrkujton se Butleri ishte hi\u00e7 m\u00eb pak se nj\u00eb institucion, dhe madje shum\u00eb i ve\u00e7ant\u00eb n\u00eb tradit\u00ebn angleze. Butleri nuk ishte vet\u00ebm sh\u00ebrb\u00ebtor; ai ishte personifikim i eleganc\u00ebs, dinjitetit, lojalitetit, profesionalizmit dhe vet\u00ebmohimit. Butleri ishte kryepun\u00ebtori i k\u00ebshtjell\u00ebs dhe pronave t\u00eb Lordit, ai ishte menaxher i stafit, dora e djatht\u00eb e shefit t\u00eb tij. Kur Lordi kishte nevoj\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb, Butleri ishte gjithmon\u00eb aty; kur Lordi kishte nevoj\u00eb p\u00ebr privat\u00ebsi Butleri dinte t\u00eb b\u00ebhej sikur s\u2019ekzistonte. Lordi ishte Lord, por pa ndihm\u00ebn e p\u00ebrditshme t\u00eb Butlerit ai do t\u00eb ndihej i humbur n\u00eb sht\u00ebpin\u00eb e vet (ose, n\u00eb k\u00ebt\u00eb rast, k\u00ebshtjell\u00ebn e vet). T\u00eb dyt\u00eb \u2013 Lordi dhe Butleri \u2013 ishin xhent\u00ebllmen\u00eb tipik t\u00eb koh\u00ebrave t\u00eb vjetra t\u00eb nj\u00eb perandorie n\u00eb per\u00ebndim e sip\u00ebr. Mir\u00ebpo, diferenca n\u00eb mes atyre dyve ishte m\u00eb se e qart\u00eb dhe madje e parap\u00ebrcaktuar q\u00eb n\u00eb lindje dhe gjenealogji: Lordi ishte pjes\u00ebtar i shtresave t\u00eb larta, aristokratike, me nj\u00eb pedigre mbres\u00ebl\u00ebn\u00ebs lord\u00ebsh mbrapa tij, nd\u00ebrsa Butleri ishte lindur dhe do t\u00eb vdiste pjes\u00ebtar i shtres\u00ebs pun\u00ebtore, ani\u00e7ka q\u00eb zot\u00ebronte me diturin\u00eb dhe eleganc\u00ebn e nj\u00eb aristokrati t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb. Megjithat\u00eb, ndarja ishte e qart\u00eb dhe rolet e tyre poashtu: Lordi mbetej Lord, gjersa Butleri mbetej sh\u00ebrb\u00ebtor.<\/p>\n Butleri \u00ebsht\u00eb d\u00ebshmitar okular i shum\u00eb festave, pritjeve madh\u00ebshtore e konferencave private q\u00eb Lord Darlington organizonte n\u00eb k\u00ebshtjell\u00ebn e tij. Sidomos gjat\u00eb pjes\u00ebs s\u00eb fundit t\u00eb viteve \u201930, duke par\u00eb acarimin e raporteve t\u00eb Gjermanis\u00eb naziste me pjes\u00ebn tjet\u00ebr t\u00eb Evrop\u00ebs, Lordi b\u00ebn \u00e7mos q\u00eb t\u00eb parandaloj\u00eb shp\u00ebrthimin e konfliktit duke nd\u00ebrmjet\u00ebsuar n\u00eb mes tyre. Mir\u00ebpo edhe pse kishte q\u00ebllime t\u00eb mira e bujare, Lordi d\u00ebshmohet t\u00eb ket\u00eb qen\u00eb naiv n\u00eb orvatjet e tij n\u00eb politik\u00ebb\u00ebrje. Rezulton q\u00eb nazist\u00ebt e kishin shfryt\u00ebzuar at\u00eb p\u00ebr t\u00eb neutralizuar Anglin\u00eb derisa ata b\u00ebhen gati t\u00eb pushtojn\u00eb Evrop\u00ebn. Shih p\u00ebr k\u00ebt\u00eb, pas luft\u00ebs Lordi thuaja se shpallet tradhtar n\u00eb Angli, dhe pas ca viteve vdes i d\u00ebshp\u00ebruar dhe n\u00eb vetmi. \u00cbsht\u00eb Z. Stevens, Butleri, ai q\u00eb i rri lojal deri n\u00eb fund.<\/p>\n N\u00eb k\u00ebshtjell\u00eb kishte sh\u00ebrbyer edhe zonjusha Kenton, e cila ishte p\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebse p\u00ebr amvis\u00ebrin\u00eb n\u00eb k\u00ebshtjell\u00eb. Raporti n\u00eb mes saj dhe Z. Stevens kishte qen\u00eb i bazuar n\u00eb respekt t\u00eb nd\u00ebrsjell\u00eb dhe etik\u00eb profesionale. Megjithat\u00eb, n\u00ebn petkun e profesionalizmit rigjid nganj\u00ebher\u00eb g\u00eblonte nj\u00eb ndjenj\u00eb simpatie e nd\u00ebrsjell\u00eb e cila, kushedi, nj\u00eb dit\u00eb do t\u00eb mund t\u00eb harlisej n\u00eb dashuri t\u00eb mir\u00ebfillt\u00eb. \u00cbsht\u00eb zonjusha Kenton ajo q\u00eb disa her\u00eb orvatet t\u00eb zbus\u00eb zemr\u00ebn e ftoht\u00eb t\u00eb Z. Stevens, duke shkrepur ndonj\u00eb batut\u00eb, apo duke iu kund\u00ebrv\u00ebn\u00eb atij nga frustrimi. Por Z. Stevens mbetet nj\u00eb Butler perfeksionist q\u00eb, p\u00ebr hir t\u00eb besnik\u00ebris\u00eb ndaj pun\u00ebs dhe Lordit t\u00eb tij, arrin t\u00eb ndrydh\u00eb deri n\u00eb fund ndjenjat e tij ndaj zonjush\u00ebs Kenton. Deri kur nj\u00eb dit\u00eb ajo e l\u00eb pun\u00ebn, martohet me dik\u00eb tjet\u00ebr dhe shp\u00ebrngulet n\u00eb jug-per\u00ebndim t\u00eb Anglis\u00eb. Romani n\u00eb fakt p\u00ebrqendrohet n\u00eb fillim-vitet \u201950, kur Z. Stevens vendos\u00eb t\u00eb vizitoj\u00eb zonjush\u00ebn Kenton n\u00eb sht\u00ebpin\u00eb e saj dhe t\u2019ia ofroj\u00eb mund\u00ebsin\u00eb q\u00eb t\u00eb kthehet n\u00eb pun\u00ebn e saj t\u00eb vjet\u00ebr n\u00eb k\u00ebshtjell\u00eb. N\u00eb t\u00eb v\u00ebrtet\u00eb ai d\u00ebshiron q\u00eb k\u00ebshtu ta korrigjoj\u00eb gabimin e b\u00ebr\u00eb shum\u00eb vite m\u00eb her\u00ebt dhe t\u00eb b\u00ebhet bashk\u00eb me t\u00eb. Mir\u00ebpo kan\u00eb kaluar plot nj\u00ebzet vite, dhe zonjusha Kenton \u00ebsht\u00eb tashm\u00eb nj\u00eb grua n\u00eb prag t\u00eb pleq\u00ebris\u00eb, paksa e lodhur dhe e pik\u00eblluar nga jeta. Edhe Z. Stevens \u00ebsht\u00eb tashm\u00eb n\u00eb muzg t\u00eb jet\u00ebs s\u00eb tij, i nd\u00ebrgjegj\u00ebsuar si asnj\u00ebher\u00eb m\u00eb par\u00eb se qenia e tij po shkonte drejt per\u00ebndimit, ashtu si\u00e7 kishte per\u00ebnduar edhe koha e perandoris\u00eb angleze me doket e zakonet e saj.<\/p>\n Dit\u00ebt q\u00eb na kan\u00eb mbetur \u2013 filmi<\/u><\/em><\/p>\n Bazuar n\u00eb njohurit\u00eb personale mbi jet\u00ebn n\u00eb Angli, doket dhe zakonet e saj, hitorin\u00eb e saj gjat\u00eb viteve para Luft\u00ebs s\u00eb Dyt\u00eb Bot\u00ebrore, un\u00eb krijoj imazhet e rr\u00ebfimit teksa lexoj vepr\u00ebn. Imagjinata nd\u00ebrton nj\u00eb Z. Stevens, q\u00eb sipas meje ishte nj\u00eb burr\u00eb i drejt\u00eb dhe thatuk, dhe ndoshta me pak mustaqe te holla e elegante. Veshja e tij ishte gjithmon\u00eb dendi e me kravat\u00eb, madje edhe n\u00eb dit\u00eb pushimi. Nd\u00ebrsa zonjusha Kenton ishte paksa e druajtur por edhe e vendosur n\u00eb q\u00ebllimet e saj. Kishte nj\u00eb bukuri t\u00eb njom\u00eb e t\u00eb \u00e7ilt\u00ebr. Figura e Lordit Darlington p\u00ebr mua u b\u00eb nj\u00eb me at\u00eb t\u00eb nj\u00eb profesori tim t\u00eb vjet\u00ebr q\u00eb kishte ligj\u00ebruar l\u00ebnd\u00ebn \u201cStates and Power since 1945\u201d gjat\u00eb studimeve t\u00eb mia n\u00eb Angli. Edhe ky profesori im kishte at\u00eb t\u00eb folur\u00ebn aristokrate, ishte i shkolluar n\u00eb Oxford, dhe n\u00eb p\u00ebrgjith\u00ebsi mbushte kriteret p\u00ebr t\u00eb qen\u00eb stereotip i nj\u00eb pjes\u00ebtari t\u00eb shtresave t\u00eb larta angleze.<\/p>\n Mir\u00ebpo pastaj ndodhi di\u00e7ka e paparashikuar: pasi lexova romanin, papritur zbulova q\u00eb vepra ishte p\u00ebrshtatur n\u00eb film me t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin em\u00ebr. N\u00eb filmin e realizuar m\u00eb 1993 luajn\u00eb hi\u00e7 m\u00eb pak se Anthony Hopkins n\u00eb rolin e Z. Stevens dhe Emma Thompson si zonjusha Kempton. Edhe pse shikimi i filmit ishte k\u00ebnaq\u00ebsi, m\u00eb duhet t\u00eb them se p\u00ebrjetimi fillestar mbi romanin e lexuar p\u00ebsoi modifikime nd\u00ebr m\u00eb t\u00eb ndryshmet e m\u00eb t\u00eb papriturat. N\u00eb nj\u00eb m\u00ebnyr\u00eb, do t\u00eb ishte m\u00eb leht\u00eb po t\u00eb ishte realizimi i filmit i dob\u00ebt, pasi q\u00eb n\u00eb at\u00eb rast romani do ta mbizot\u00ebronte at\u00eb. Mir\u00ebpo, si\u00e7 pritej nga ky duo i kinematografis\u00eb bot\u00ebrore, Hopkins dhe Thompson ishin t\u00eb jasht\u00ebzakonsh\u00ebm. Ata t\u00eb dyt\u00eb kishin arritur q\u00eb t\u00eb personifikoheshin aq mir\u00eb me Z. Stevens dhe zonjush\u00ebn Kempton respektivisht saq\u00eb druaj se n\u00eb mendjen time personazhet e romanit nuk mund t\u00eb jetojn\u00eb m\u00eb pa k\u00ebta aktor\u00eb, dhe anasjelltas. Madje edhe e folura teatrale e Anthony Hopkins u b\u00eb e folura e Z. Stevens. Buz\u00ebqeshja enigmatike e Emma Thompson u b\u00eb buz\u00ebqeshje e zonjush\u00ebs Kempton.<\/p>\n Tani mua si lexues\/shikues i romanit\/filmit \u201dDit\u00ebt q\u00eb na kan\u00eb mbetur\u201d nuk m\u00eb mbetet tjet\u00ebr ve\u00e7se t\u00eb rropatem me rikalibrimin e ndjesive mbi k\u00ebt\u00eb rr\u00ebfim, t\u00eb p\u00ebr\u00e7uar tek un\u00eb n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet dy mediumeve. Imazhet e emocionet e p\u00ebrjetuara gjat\u00eb leximit t\u00eb romanit u desh t\u00eb riadaptohen me ndjesit\u00eb e reja nga filmi. \u00cbsht\u00eb proces pasurues por edhe mjaft frustrues. Ky p\u00ebrjetim i dyfisht\u00eb madje nxit\u00eb nj\u00ebfar\u00eb beteje t\u00eb brendshme katartike, derisa eventualisht p\u00ebrjetimi me t\u00eb cilin del nga kjo p\u00ebrvoj\u00eb i bashk\u00ebdyzon romanin dhe filmin n\u00eb nj\u00eb, dhe ashtu gjen paqen. T\u00eb pakt\u00ebn n\u00eb teori!<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" \u00cbsht\u00eb nj\u00eb p\u00ebrjetim i rrall\u00eb dhe i ve\u00e7ant\u00eb kur rastis t\u00eb lexosh nj\u00eb roman mbres\u00ebl\u00ebn\u00ebs, dhe pastaj t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin e sheh si film. P\u00ebr t\u00eb nj\u00ebjtin rr\u00ebfim p\u00ebrjetimi vjen i dyfisht\u00eb, i p\u00ebr\u00e7uar tek audienca n\u00ebp\u00ebrmjet dy mediumeve t\u00eb ndryshme. Filmi e p\u00ebrmbush romanin dhe anasjelltas, gj\u00eb q\u00eb i ndihmon audienc\u00ebs t\u00eb krijoj\u00eb nj\u00eb tablo […]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":405,"featured_media":1473,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[693,695,607],"ppma_author":[698],"class_list":["post-1472","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-analize","tag-literature","tag-philosophy","tag-uk"],"authors":[{"term_id":698,"user_id":405,"is_guest":0,"slug":"armend-bekaj","display_name":"Armend Bekaj","avatar_url":{"url":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/armend-bekaj.png","url2x":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/11\/armend-bekaj.png"},"user_url":"","last_name":"Bekaj","first_name":"Armend","description":"Armend Bekaj \u00ebsht\u00eb Ligj\u00ebrues n\u00eb Departamentin p\u00ebr K\u00ebrkime t\u00eb Paqes dhe Konfliktit n\u00eb Universitetin e Uppsala-s, Suedi. Ka punuar p\u00ebr nj\u00eb s\u00ebr\u00eb organizatash nd\u00ebrkomb\u00ebtare, p\u00ebrfshir\u00eb International IDEA n\u00eb Suedi. Ka t\u00eb kryer doktorat\u00ebn n\u00eb shkenca politike n\u00eb Universitetin e Sheffield, Britani t\u00eb Madhe."}],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1472","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/405"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1472"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1472\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1474,"href":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1472\/revisions\/1474"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1473"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1472"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1472"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1472"},{"taxonomy":"author","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sbunker.org\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/ppma_author?post=1472"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}